Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
Eagleview Middle School "We don't have to agree with what we read, but we should learn from it. To prevent children from knowing about the world and human nature is unrealistic.
They are just inexperienced," said Judy Blume, a veteran of censorship wars. Shielding children from the cruel reality of the world doesn't do them any favors. Instead of shielding children, parents can offer a perspective from personal experiences and help children interpret the world, its realities and flaws.
Children, with guidance from parents, should be able to make decisions about what they read and believe. Parents need to take the responsibility, deciding what is appropriate or inappropriate for their children. We shouldn't sacrifice our First Amendment rights to censors just to be protected from what other people consider right and wrong.
The determination about which books should be restricted from children depends on their level of maturity. A person less mature might misinterpret the meaning of subject matter resulting in inappropriate thoughts, beliefs or behavior. Conversely, a person who is mature enough to comprehend what the author is implying will understand the message being emphasized.
Again, parents' supervision is indicated, not banning.
Reading is one of our greatest freedoms. Censorship leads to conformity. This limits the range and variety of inquiry and expression on which our culture depends.
Creativity, research, and technological advances would be limited. Democracy's responsibility is to make available a diversity of views, popular and unpopular. It's not right to coerce the thought of some and inhibit the efforts of others.
All community members should have equal access to the entire range of written resources. Publishers' responsibilities are to give the full meaning to the freedom to read by providing books that enrich the quality and diversity of expression.
The freedom to read is of little consequence unless the reader can obtain material to suit his purpose. Libraries should be allowed to provide information presenting contrasting viewpoints on historical issues.
History teaches students the events that shaped the world. Materials shouldn't be removed because of differing partisan or doctrinal views. A person's right to use a library for research should not be denied because of parents' conflicting views either.
We don't have to agree with what we read, but we should learn from it. The First Amendment guarantees our freedom to decide what we choose to read and think. Though someone may be convinced his views are right, that individual is not entitled to impose them on others.
When books are banned, it illustrates a refusal of the censors to look at the world with open eyes; to close their eyes like they closed the banned book. Banning books divulges more about the censor than the book or the author brought into the limelight.
Freedom to read means that you are able to read freely without the possibility of being stopped because the material is inappropriate according to the challenger's belief system. If the challenger doesn't like the book, maybe he shouldn't read it or let his children read it.
But banning books takes the books off the shelves, abolishing even the slightest chance that those condemned books might be able to be read at all. Banning for one bans for all.
I say let's get back to the good old First Amendment of the good old-fashioned United States -- and to hell with the censors! Give me knowledge, or give me death! Obviously, the most important change would be made first.
|Persuasive Paper - Book Banning | Essay Example||Banning books in school libraries essay You are here:|
|Get Full Essay||Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.|
|Your access to this site has been limited||Ap world history dbq essay ram essays of africa editors graphene and silicon comparison essay.|
|Who can edit:||Book Banning Book Banning has existed in America since colonial times, when legislatures and royal governors enacted laws against blasphemy and seditious libel. Legislatures in the early American republic passed laws against obscenity.|
|Research Paper on Legal Issues. Essays, Term Papers on Cloning Banning||Jan 12, in Informative Book Banning In the United States, the issue of book banning has become a burning issue since the colonial era; it was the first time when the governing bodies and royal governors endorsed laws against blasphemy and rebellious libel. In the Early American Republic, the governing bodies used to pass laws, in order to fight with obscenity.|
If the First Amendment states that it is okay to write as you wish, then I believe it's okay to write as you wish. And a corollary to that is it's okay to read what you want, too. Depriving others of the chance to read is an unjust thing to do. It doesn't matter if another doesn't want to read a book because the author said something that was offensive, but don't try to control another's value system by limiting their exposure to ideas.
If the privilege of writing something one believes in is taken away, then the privilege of believing has been taken away. Freedom to read is the freedom to read anything. I have read many books I wanted to read even though it was prohibited and that's the way I want it to always be. I want it to always be this way because my interest jumps a notch when someone tells me a book's controversial.Sep 26, · "To celebrate the indomitable and visionary spirit of both the moonshiners and these authors—each one a trailblazer in her or his own way—I’ve paired Transcript of Banning Books Essay Outline Opinion Point #1 Point #2 Point #3 Conclusion Banning books violates the first amendment: freedom of speech.
Banning books . Bible - Book Of Job Essay Words | 3 Pages One area in the bible which I have a problem understanding is the story in the beginning of Job.
Say no to book banning, say no to the man that believes to be above all others, say no to the system that tries to corrupt the minds of the nation, let all literature flourish and blossom into its miraculous greatness, and above all inform the man that to ban a book is to ban knowledge, to ban knowledge is to encourage ignorance, to encourage.
Essay Censorship Is The Banning Of Books The most debated and controversial form of censorship is the banning of books in school libraries and classrooms. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, The Call of the Wild, The Catcher in the Rye, and To Kill a Mockingbird are just a few of the books that have been expelled from the American public schools.
Banning Smoking in public places Have you ever stopped to think about the dangers of smoking? Did you ever put in your consideration about o.